Public page · no account

Ranked by how early.
Not by how much.

Rank wallets on profit and you surface whales — people with size. Rank them on timing and you surface something else: the addresses that were already in the pool before there was any reason to be.

ENTRIES THE MOVE t = 0 · pump begins −10m −5m −1m 0 +2m +10m Qw8x…2pRv −41s median across 96 pumps
Each mark is one entry · red is before the moveIllustrative

What counts as a move

Any lead-time number is meaningless without saying what it is early to. This is the definition in use. It is arbitrary — every such definition is — so the only honest thing to do is fix it and publish it.

Changed only with a dated note on this page
A pump begins at the first slot where
  5-minute return > trailing 60-minute volatility
  and quote volume in that window ≥ $25,000

Lead time = entry slot − pump slot, in seconds.
One pump per pool per 6 hours.
Volatility: standard deviation of 1-minute log returns
Entries below $250 are ignored as dust
Pools under $25k of lifetime volume never qualify
See the same wallets ranked by dollars Showing 10 of 100 · demo data · rolling 30 days
Reading this

Hit rate is the share of a wallet's entries that landed before the pump line rather than after it. A sharp median with a low hit rate is luck; a sharp median with a high hit rate across a hundred pools is not.

Being early is not evidence of anything on its own. Snipers, bots watching mempool, and people who simply read a Telegram faster all show up here. What the page does is make the pattern visible, and give you the address so you can look at it yourself.

Nothing on this page claims a wallet knew anything. It reports when they bought, relative to a definition printed above it, and lets you draw your own conclusion — which is the same standard every other page here holds to.

Any of these ever been
early on you?

Paste an address. If one of these wallets was reducing supply into a window you were buying into, it will be in your ledger.

Trace a wallet